-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
OCPBUGS-55359: install/0000_00_cluster-version-operator_01_admingate_configmap: Add ack-4.18-kube-1.32-api-removals-in-4.19 #1181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ack-4.18-kube-1.32-api-removals-in-4.19 Like 898b74c (Add admin-gate for OCP 4.17, 2024-09-06, openshift#1085) and similar.
|
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55359, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55359, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This is expected for this 4.18-to-4.19 guard (no 4.19 code needed, by the time you're running 4.19 code in your cluster, you're already past the point we want to guard). I'll manually set |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
e2e-agnostic-operator had infra-capacity issues ( Neither seems related to my change. /retest-required |
| include.release.openshift.io/self-managed-high-availability: "true" | ||
| data: | ||
| ack-4.18-kube-1.32-api-removals-in-4.19: |- | ||
| Kubernetes 1.32 and therefore OpenShift 4.19 remove several APIs which require admin consideration. Please see the knowledge article https://access.redhat.com/articles/7112216 for details and instructions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @wking as per the doc link https://access.redhat.com/articles/7112216,
Per the [Kubernetes documentation](https://access.redhat.com/bounce/?externalURL=https%3A%2F%2Fkubernetes.io%2Fdocs%2Freference%2Fusing-api%2Fdeprecation-guide%2F%23v1-29), Kubernetes 1.32 removed several deprecated APIs. OpenShift Container Platform 4.19 plans to use Kubernetes 1.32.
Unlike past releases of OpenShift Container Platform that introduced Kubernetes API removals, OpenShift Container Platform 4.19 does not require an administrator acknowledgment before upgrading to it.
bit confused over the statements, and i dont see in doc that the acknowledgement is required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch! It's @bergerhoffer 's KCS, and she's said she can have it updated and published by Wednesday the 30th, when the next 4.18.z that might consume this will be built. So I think we can merge as it stands, and have the KCS updated to call out the need for an ack by the time customers might be running clusters with the gate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
KCS is updated to reflect that there is actually going to be an admin-ack this time. Once this PR merges and we know what z-stream it'll be in, I'll update the KCS with that value and publish.
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hongkailiu, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
we will be doing post-merge testing so approving for merging |
|
@dis016 needs to be a /label no-qe |
|
Thanks @petr-muller |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@wking: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
94c0e70
into
openshift:release-4.18
|
@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55359: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55359 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: cluster-version-operator |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.18.0-0.nightly-2025-05-06-153745 |
Like 898b74c (#1085) and similar.